Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS): Toward the Uniform Assessment of Bariatric Surgery Outcomes
نویسندگان
چکیده
p i n c i q Continuous evaluation of our medical or surgical practice is essential to ensure we are providing high quality care to our patients. Nonetheless, to measure the outcomes of our practice we need to use a standardized and valid method that allows us to monitor our practice and to compare our practice with the practice of others. The evaluation of results in bariatric surgery is complicated by the lack of standards for comparison, the use of different parameters to report weight loss, and the multiple definitions of success and failure in the literature. Surgeons have traditionally used weight loss as the main postoperative outcome, although it has become very clear that the improvement of medical conditions associated with obesity and the quality of life should be included in the final analysis. Another controversial issue is how to account for reoperations due to complications or unsatisfactory weight loss in the final assessment of results, because many surgeons consider a reoperation as a failure, while others do not. The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) was developed by NIH Consensus Conference panelists at 1998 to answer a need for a standardized method
منابع مشابه
Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS)
BACKGROUND The lack of standards for comparison of results was identified by the NIH Consensus Conference panelists as one of the key problems in evaluating reports in the surgical treatment of severe obesity. The analysis of outcomes after bariatric surgery should include weight loss, improvement in comorbidities related to obesity, and quality-of-life (QOL) assessment. Definitions of success ...
متن کاملBariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS) applied to laparoscopic gastric banding patients.
BACKGROUND The definition of success and failure of a bariatric procedure should include weight loss as well as improvement in comorbidity and quality of life assessment. The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS), introduced by Oria and Moorhead in 1997, seems to provide a standard for comparison in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity. METHODS 180 morbidly obese and sup...
متن کاملComparison of the efficacy of standard bariatric surgical procedures on Saudi population using the bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system
OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy of various standard bariatric surgical procedures using the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS). Methods: This is a prospective, descriptive analytical study conducted in 2 medical institutions in Saudi Arabia. A total of 270 patients who had different bariatric surgery during the period between March 2010 and December 2012 were included. ...
متن کاملBariatric analysis and reporting outcome
The evaluation of outcome in bariatric surgery is one of the major concerns for surgeons (1). An objective analysis is hindered by the absence of a standard for comparison of data, and by restricted periods of follow-up usually analysed. In fact, different parameters have been proposed in order to assess the outcome after bariatric surgical procedures, as well as the weight loss, the percentage...
متن کاملPreliminary Outcomes 1 Year after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Based on Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS)
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a stand-alone bariatric operation according to the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS). METHODS Out of 112 patients included and operated on initially, 84 patients (F/M, 63:21) were followed up for 14-56 months (mean 22 ± 6.75). Patients lost to follow-up did not attend sche...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 22 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015